6 Comments
User's avatar
Mathias Mas's avatar

very good man!

Expand full comment
Max Leyf's avatar

Nice.

You wrote:

“My secondary question here is: If the synthesis that structures perception is open to examination, can it also be cultivated?

I think we can say, yes, but we need to lay out few more details to describe, exactly, how and where this cultivation takes.”

Should it read “takes PLACE”?

Expand full comment
Adam Robbert's avatar

Yes, thanks for catching that. Updated!

Expand full comment
Isaac William's avatar

Really like this analysis Adam. You've bought in Kant very well and articulated a universal theory for how we can enhance our perception by taking responsibility for training the faculties that comprise it. Not an easy thing to explain, but you've done it well. Very good

Expand full comment
Adam Robbert's avatar

Thanks, Isaac!

Expand full comment
Paul Musso, PhD's avatar

Very interesting take on Kant that I have never seen before. I love the idea of understanding Kantianism as shaping the subject.

You made Kant's transcendental philosophy very accessible by the way, which I appreciate.

My question is how does this interpretation of Kant relate to phenomenology?

Expand full comment